Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update

TALENT PULSE NEWS

update
Add Element
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Talent Acquisition Trends
    • Culture & Engagement
    • Employer Branding & Candidate Experience
    • Hiring Tools & HR Tech
    • Policy & Workforce Law
    • Employee Resource Group News
    • Featured
December 12.2025
3 Minutes Read

How HR Can Prepare for the 27th Biweekly Payday in 2026

Hand passing a check, related to 27th biweekly pay period.


Anticipating the 2026 Payroll Shift

As we approach 2026, a unique payroll challenge awaits many employers. That year, organizations that process payments biweekly will face an unusual scenario: a 27th paycheck. According to payroll expert Robert Pritchard from Littler Mendelson, this phenomenon occurs about every 11 to 12 years. For many human resource professionals, this means it's time to prepare financially and operationally for the added complexities that come with an extra payroll cycle.

Understanding Why This Happens

In a typical year, companies pay their employees biweekly, resulting in 26 pay periods within 52 weeks, leaving a couple of days unaccounted for in a standard 365-day calendar. When the first payday of the year falls on January 2, it results in an extra pay date due to the structure of the calendar and the presence of a federal bank holiday on January 1, 2027. This can generate confusion, especially for those overseeing payroll.

Three Strategies to Navigate the 2026 Pay Period

Employers have three primary strategies for managing payroll in 2026 that can either ease the transition or complicate it depending on the approach chosen:

  1. Pro-Rata Adjustment: Divide each annual salary by 27 instead of 26, slightly lowering each biweekly paycheck. For example, a $70,000 salary would yield approximately $2,592 versus $2,692 per pay period.

  2. Pay As Usual: Maintain the regular paycheck amount without adjustment. This method treats the extra pay cycle as a bonus, leading to paychecks that exceed the typical annual salary. Employees favor this option, but it can impact budgeting.

  3. Hybrid Approach: Employers may choose to adjust salaries only until certain events, like pay increases, aligning the new pay structure optimally with employee expectations.

Preparing for Payroll Changes: A Checklist

Employers should proactively prepare for the implications of these strategies. Here's a quick checklist:

  • Review Payroll Calendar: Verify the inclusion of the extra pay period and the exact dates.

  • Update Payroll Systems: Ensure software is calibrated for the additional pay date to maintain accurate calculations.

  • Communicate with Employees: Be transparent about changes to paychecks to alleviate concerns and confusion.

  • Monitor Employee Benefits and Tax Withholdings: Double-check deductions to ensure they align with the updated payroll cycle.

  • Engage Finance Teams: Assess how this might affect overall cash flow and budget for the year.

Impact on Hourly Employees

Hourly workers will also experience the effects of the 27th paycheck, but the calculation method remains straightforward as payment is based directly on hours worked. Their overall annual pay will naturally increase, effectively giving them an additional paycheck.

Conclusion: Being Proactive Counts

While the emergence of a 27th paycheck in 2026 may cause alarm, HR leaders can manage the situation with proper planning. Understanding the various approaches to handling payroll and being proactive in communication can help ease the transition, ultimately ensuring employee satisfaction and compliance with payroll regulations. For more insights on optimizing your hiring and recruitment practices as you navigate these changes, consider how strategic adjustments in the payroll setting can enhance your hiring process and candidate experience.


Talent Acquisition Trends

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
12.13.2025

Starbucks' DEI Practices Under Fire: What This Means for Hiring Trends

Update Understanding the Legal Challenge Against Starbucks' DEI Practices The controversy surrounding Starbucks' diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives has recently escalated into a legal battle, raising significant questions about hiring practices in corporate America. Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier has filed a lawsuit against the coffee giant, accusing it of implementing race-based discrimination in its hiring and promotion strategies. This comes against the backdrop of a growing national conversation about the legality and ethics of DEI programs. What Does the Lawsuit Allegedly Reveal? The complaint highlights serious allegations, asserting that Starbucks allegedly favored minority candidates at the expense of qualified nonminority applicants. Using the precedent set by the Students for Fair Admissions case against Harvard, the lawsuit invokes the Florida Civil Rights Act. The charges include claims that the company not only set hiring quotas but also based pay rates on race, which could set a troubling precedent for DEI practices across various industries. The Broader Context of DEI in Hiring Companies increasingly emphasize DEI to enhance workplace culture and attract talent. However, the Starbucks lawsuit brings to light the risks associated with such initiatives, particularly if they inadvertently lead to claims of discrimination. This scenario illustrates the delicate balance that organizations must strike in promoting diversity while adhering to employment laws. As a talent acquisition manager, the implications of this case could resonate deeply within your recruitment strategies—from how job postings are crafted to how candidates are evaluated through applicant tracking systems. Future Implications for Diversity Initiatives The outcome of this lawsuit could significantly impact DEI policies nationwide. Organizations should prepare for potential shifts in legal interpretations regarding race-based practices. As industries respond, talent acquisition specialists must reassess recruitment best practices and ensure compliance to avoid legal ramifications. Incorporating skills-based hiring could be a proactive strategy, focusing more on qualifications rather than demographic characteristics. Conclusion: Navigating the Future of DEI As discussions about diversity continue to evolve, it's crucial for business leaders to remain informed and adaptable. Uthmeier's accusations against Starbucks are just one example of a broader scrutiny confronting corporate America. It’s essential not only to uphold DEI aspirations but to do so within the legal framework ensuring fairness for all candidates. As you refine sourcing strategies, ensure that all hiring processes promote equity without unintentionally crossing legal boundaries. For those involved in recruitment, staying updated on such legal challenges can enhance your candidate experience and optimize your hiring processes, benefiting both applicants and your organization in the long run.

12.13.2025

Unlocking Efficient Hiring: The Essential Intake Meeting Checklist for Recruiters

Update Mastering the Intake Meeting: Your Key to Recruitment SuccessIntake meetings are often viewed as mere formalities in the recruitment process, yet they hold the potential to redefine hiring success for talent acquisition professionals. For hiring managers and recruiters alike, establishing clear communication and expectations at the outset can mean the difference between a seamless recruitment journey and a chaotic, misaligned search.Understanding the Importance of Intake MeetingsAt their core, intake meetings are structured conversations designed to align recruiters with hiring managers on essential details such as role expectations, candidate profiles, and sourcing strategies. This foundational step ensures all involved parties understand not just what the job entails, but why it exists in the first place. Without these insights, recruitment efforts can drift off course, echoing the familiar refrain, "This could’ve been an email." The structured nature of intake meetings helps combat this by ensuring both parties are on the same page from the start.Why Questionnaires Alone Won't Cut ItWhile questionnaires may seem like a time-efficient alternative to meetings, they often fail to capture the nuance and context that arise during conversations. Questionnaires can provide necessary data, such as required experience or skill sets, but they cannot reveal the deeper motivations behind why a role needs filling. For instance, understanding the dynamics of team struggles or past hiring missteps can drastically alter how you approach sourcing candidates. Without the insights gathered from a thorough intake meeting, recruiters may run into obstacles later that could have been addressed upfront.Building Relationships Through ConversationRecruiters are not just order processors; they are advisors who build partnerships with hiring managers through open dialogue. An initial intake meeting fosters relationships, cultivating trust and understanding that are essential for effective collaboration. As noted by industry experts, a strong partnership between recruiters and hiring managers enhances overall recruitment performance, further validating the importance of dedicating time to this often-underestimated step.Setting Realistic Expectations EarlyIntake meetings serve as a unique opportunity to calibrate expectations before sourcing begins, allowing recruiters to advocate for realistic timelines and feasibility based on current market data. For example, during these discussions, recruiters can clarify which skills are non-negotiable and which might be flexible, helping to open up the talent pool significantly. This proactive approach not only expedites the hiring process but also mitigates the risk of misalignment further down the road.Actionable Insights for Your Recruitment StrategyTo maximize the effectiveness of your intake meetings, consider preparing specific questions that will drive your conversation with the hiring manager. Questions regarding the must-haves for the role, team dynamics, and evaluation methodologies can provide significant clarity. Establishing a mutual understanding of the candidate profile and the metrics for success before you start sourcing creates a solid foundation for an efficient recruitment process.Embrace the Power of Collective InsightUltimately, the power of the intake meeting lies in harnessing collective insights from both recruiters and hiring managers. By engaging in meaningful conversations, aligning on expectations, and forging strong relationships, your team will not only attract top talent but also foster a positive candidate experience throughout the hiring process. As we push into new hiring trends, don't overlook this crucial step—your recruitment strategy will thank you.

12.11.2025

Columbia University Settlement Process: Major Steps Against Antisemitism

Update A Landmark Settlement at Columbia University The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has recently opened the claims process for a substantial $21 million settlement agreed upon by Columbia University. This historic class settlement marks a pivotal step in addressing alleged patterns of antisemitic harassment directed toward Jewish employees at the university. The process is aimed at both current and former employees who may have experienced discrimination due to their Jewish faith, ancestry, or Israeli national origin, as well as those who have spoken out against such treatment. Understanding the Claims Process Employees who worked at Columbia between October 7, 2023, and July 23, 2025, are encouraged to submit claims by June 2, 2026. Those eligible can file claims through the EEOC's dedicated website, eeoccolumbiasettlement.com. This settlement is not only a financial resolution; it also aims to reaffirm the commitment to create a workplace environment free from discrimination. Responses and Broader Implications EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas emphasized that this settlement is the largest in nearly two decades related to harassment and discrimination claims, particularly those regarding antisemitism. She encouraged all eligible employees to take advantage of the claims process as a means to address their grievances. The university, while denying liability, has voluntarily complied with the agreement to avoid prolonged disputes and the potential loss of federal funding, highlighting how financial pressures can interplay with institutional policy changes. The Landscape of Workplace Discrimination The EEOC's actions are also part of a broader narrative where various universities, including Cornell and the University of Pennsylvania, have faced scrutiny regarding their handling of antisemitism on campus. These institutions have been compelled to adjust their policies related to diversity, equity, and inclusivity initiatives under pressure from federal regulations. As a result, organizations within higher education must reevaluate their commitment to non-discrimination and how they can better address and prevent such grievances moving forward. Next Steps for Employers and Employees From this settlement, employers should take note of the importance of fostering a safe work environment that actively combats harassment. Employees, on the other hand, should be aware of their rights and the processes in place to report violations. The Columbia settlement serves as a crucial reminder of the need for vigilance and proactive measures in cultivating workplace cultures where all individuals are validated and protected, regardless of their background. It's essential for companies to stay ahead of hiring trends and recruitment best practices that emphasize a skills-based hiring approach and promote inclusivity without compromising the safety and respect of their workforce. For more insights on optimizing hiring processes, explore cutting-edge strategies to enhance the candidate experience across varying workplace scenarios.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*